Best local LLMs by task and size
A curated summary of well-regarded models by task and size, drawn from external benchmarks. We do not run our own benchmarks; every entry is attributed and dated so you can judge it yourself.
The best local LLM for general chat, by memory budget
A quick answer to the most common question: which local LLM models to run for general chat at each memory budget. These are well-regarded picks from our catalogue that fit the memory shown, offered as a starting point rather than a scored verdict. New to this? Begin with choosing your first model and check your own hardware on the hardware matrix. For coding specifically, see choosing a local coding model. For a broader per-task, per-hardware view that also weighs community opinion alongside benchmarks, see the recommendations dataset.
| Memory budget | Well-regarded pick | Pull with Ollama |
|---|---|---|
| ~8GB | Qwen3 8B Lighter still: Llama 3.2 3B | qwen3:8b |
| ~16GB | Qwen3 14B | qwen3:14b |
| ~24GB | Qwen3 32B Faster mixture-of-experts: Qwen3 30B-A3B | qwen3:32b |
| ~48GB | Llama 3.3 70B | llama3.3:70b |
| ~128GB unified | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Also sparse and quick: Ling Flash 2.0 | See model page |
| Server / multi-GPU | gpt-oss-120b | gpt-oss:120b |
The table spans three bands: a single consumer card (roughly 8 to 48GB), a 128GB unified-memory machine (an Apple Silicon Mac, an AMD Strix Halo box or an NVIDIA Spark), and a server or multi-GPU rig. On Apple Silicon, use your total unified memory as the budget: a 32GB Mac suits Qwen3 32B, 64GB or more suits Llama 3.3 70B, and 128GB opens up the sparse mixture-of-experts models. Note that the models topping public benchmark leaderboards are typically far too large to run at home at all, so they are out of scope here. Memory figures are approximate and depend on quantisation and context length, and "fits" does not always mean "runs fast". The sourced, dated tables below are the detailed view.
General chat
General-purpose assistants and instruction following.
| Size tier | Model | Draws on | Source | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium | Qwen3 32B Alibaba An independent aggregate index. The strongest general model that fits a single 24GB card in this set. | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1: 11 | Artificial Analysis | August 2026 |
| Medium | Mistral Small 3.2 24B Mistral AI A releasing-organisation figure. A permissive, multimodal European alternative on a 24GB card. | HumanEval Plus (Pass@5) 92.9% | Mistral Small 3.2 model card | June 2025 |
| Large | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Meta A releasing-organisation figure. Treat as a claim pending independent confirmation. | MMLU 86.0 | Meta model card | December 2024 |
| Large | gpt-oss-120b OpenAI An independent aggregate index across nine evaluations. Runs on a single 80GB card. | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1: 24 | Artificial Analysis | August 2026 |
Coding
Code generation, completion, and understanding.
| Size tier | Model | Draws on | Source | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiny | Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct Alibaba A releasing-organisation figure. HumanEval measures single-function generation, not agentic coding. | HumanEval 88.4% | Qwen2.5-Coder technical report | September 2024 |
| Small | Devstral Small Mistral AI A releasing-organisation figure. SWE-bench measures agentic, multi-file software tasks. Treat plain SWE-bench Verified with caution: it lost credibility to contamination in 2026, so read it as indicative, not definitive. | SWE-bench Verified 53.6% | Mistral AI model card (Devstral Small 1.1) | July 2025 |
| Medium | Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Alibaba A releasing-organisation figure; reproducibility is scaffold-sensitive, and plain SWE-bench Verified lost credibility to contamination in 2026, so treat it as indicative. A mixture-of-experts coder that runs in roughly 18GB. | SWE-bench Verified 51.6 | Qwen (official repo, OpenHands scaffold) | August 2025 |
| Medium | Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Alibaba A releasing-organisation figure. The strongest local coder that fits a 24GB card. | HumanEval 92.7, Aider Pass@2 73.7 | Qwen2.5-Coder technical report / blog | November 2024 |
| Large | gpt-oss-120b OpenAI An independent leaderboard figure. Aider Polyglot measures multi-language code editing. | Aider Polyglot 41.8% | Aider polyglot leaderboard | August 2026 |
| Very large | DeepSeek-R1 DeepSeek An independent leaderboard figure. Server-class hardware to run. | Aider Polyglot 56.9% | Aider polyglot leaderboard | August 2026 |
Reasoning
Maths, logic, and multi-step problem solving.
| Size tier | Model | Draws on | Source | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiny | Qwen3 8B Alibaba A releasing-organisation figure. Strong reasoning for a model that fits 8GB. | GPQA Diamond 62.0, AIME 2024 76.0 | Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) | May 2025 |
| Small | Qwen3 14B Alibaba A releasing-organisation figure with thinking mode enabled. | GPQA Diamond 64.0, AIME 2024 79.3 | Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) | May 2025 |
| Medium | QwQ 32B Alibaba A releasing-organisation figure. Treat as a claim pending independent confirmation. | MMLU-Pro 69.07 | Qwen model card | March 2025 |
| Medium | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen 32B DeepSeek A releasing-organisation figure. AIME is a hard maths benchmark; strong here does not imply strong everywhere. | AIME 2024 72.6% | DeepSeek model card | January 2025 |
| Large | gpt-oss-120b OpenAI A releasing-organisation figure at high reasoning effort. | GPQA Diamond 80.1, AIME 2024 95.8 | OpenAI gpt-oss model card (high reasoning) | August 2025 |
| Very large | DeepSeek-R1 DeepSeek A releasing-organisation figure. Server-class hardware to run; most people use a distill. | MMLU 90.8, AIME 2024 79.8% | DeepSeek model card | January 2025 |
Embedding
Text embeddings for retrieval and RAG.
| Size tier | Model | Draws on | Source | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiny | Qwen3 Embedding 0.6B Alibaba A releasing-organisation figure. Tiny and fast; the 8B sibling scores higher. | MTEB Multilingual Mean (Task) 64.33 | Qwen3-Embedding model card | June 2025 |
| Small | Qwen3-Embedding 8B Alibaba A leaderboard ranking rather than a self-reported score. The lighter 0.6B version of this family is in our catalogue. | MTEB Multilingual 70.58 (No.1) | Qwen, MTEB multilingual leaderboard | June 2025 |
Reranking
Re-scoring retrieved passages to sharpen RAG results.
| Size tier | Model | Draws on | Source | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiny | Qwen3-Reranker 0.6B Alibaba A releasing-organisation figure. Larger 4B and 8B siblings score higher. | MTEB-R 65.80 | Qwen3-Reranker model card | June 2025 |
| Tiny | BGE-reranker-v2-m3 BAAI A mature, widely-supported default. Figure measured by a competitor, not BAAI. | MTEB-R 57.03 | Qwen3-Reranker card comparison (competitor-measured) | June 2025 |
Vision-language
Understanding images alongside text.
| Size tier | Model | Draws on | Source | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiny | Qwen2.5-VL 7B Alibaba A releasing-organisation figure. Especially strong on documents and OCR. | DocVQA (test) 95.7, MMMU (val) 58.6 | Qwen2.5-VL technical report | February 2025 |
| Small | Llama 3.2 11B Vision Meta A releasing-organisation figure (MMMU reported with chain-of-thought). | MMMU (val) 50.7, DocVQA (test) 88.4 | Meta Llama 3.2 Vision model card | September 2024 |
Image generation
Generating images from text prompts.
No published assessment yet. We will add one here once we have a benchmark and source we can stand behind.
Speech
Speech recognition and synthesis.
| Size tier | Model | Draws on | Source | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiny | Whisper large-v3 OpenAI An independent leaderboard figure; word error rate, so lower is better. | Open ASR Leaderboard average WER 7.44 (lower is better) | Open ASR Leaderboard | October 2025 |
Head-to-head on shared benchmarks
Where two or more models we cover report the same benchmark, we line the scores up. Most are developer-reported, from the source and date on each row, so testing conditions differ between them. Scores are comparable within a board, not across boards.
General chat
Aider Polyglot
higher is better- DeepSeek-R1 56.9%
Aider polyglot leaderboard (independent) · August 2026
- gpt-oss-120b 41.8%
Aider polyglot leaderboard (independent) · August 2026
- Qwen3 32B 40.0%
Aider polyglot leaderboard (independent) · August 2026
AIME 2025
higher is better- gpt-oss-120b 92.5
OpenAI gpt-oss model card (high reasoning, no tools) · August 2025
- gpt-oss-20b 91.7
OpenAI gpt-oss model card (high reasoning, no tools) · August 2025
- Qwen3 32B 72.9
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
- Qwen3 30B-A3B 70.9
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
- Qwen3 14B 70.4
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
- QwQ 32B 69.5
Qwen3 technical report (Table 13, QwQ-32B baseline) · May 2025
- Qwen3 8B 67.3
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
-
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
higher is better- Qwen3.5-9B 32
Artificial Analysis (independent) · March 2026
- Qwen3.5-4B 27
Artificial Analysis (independent) · March 2026
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1
higher is better- gpt-oss-120b 24
Artificial Analysis (independent) · August 2026
-
Artificial Analysis (independent) · August 2026
- Qwen3 32B 11
Artificial Analysis (independent) · August 2026
-
Artificial Analysis (independent, figure marked estimated) · August 2026
-
Artificial Analysis (independent) · August 2026
DocVQA (test)
higher is better- Qwen2.5-VL 7B 95.7
Qwen2.5-VL technical report (ANLS, test) · February 2025
- Llama 3.2 11B Vision 88.4
Meta Llama 3.2 Vision model card (ANLS, test) · September 2024
LiveCodeBench v5
higher is better- Qwen3 32B 65.7
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
- Qwen3 30B-A3B 62.6
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
MBPP
higher is better-
Qwen2.5-Coder technical report (Table 16) · September 2024
-
Qwen2.5-Coder technical report · November 2024
MMLU
higher is better- DeepSeek-R1 90.8
DeepSeek model card · January 2025
-
Meta model card · December 2024
MMMU (val)
higher is better- Qwen2.5-VL 7B 58.6
Qwen2.5-VL technical report · February 2025
- Llama 3.2 11B Vision 50.7
Meta Llama 3.2 Vision model card (CoT, micro-avg) · September 2024
MTEB Multilingual Mean (Task)
higher is better- Qwen3-Embedding 0.6B 64.33
Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B model card · June 2025
- BGE-M3 59.56
Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B model card (comparison table, reported by Qwen) · June 2025
MTEB-R
higher is better- Qwen3-Reranker 0.6B 65.80
Qwen3-Reranker model card · June 2025
- BGE-reranker-v2-m3 57.03
Qwen3-Reranker card comparison table (competitor-measured) · June 2025
Coding
LiveCodeBench v6
higher is better- Qwen3.8-27B 90.3
Qwen (model card) · August 2026
- Qwen3.5-9B 65.6
Qwen (model card) · March 2026
- Qwen3.5-4B 55.8
Qwen (model card) · March 2026
SWE-bench Verified
higher is better- Muse Glimmer 30B 76.0%
Meta model card · August 2026
- gpt-oss-120b 62.4%
OpenAI gpt-oss model card (high reasoning) · August 2025
- gpt-oss-20b 60.7%
OpenAI gpt-oss model card (high reasoning) · August 2025
- Devstral Small 53.6%
Mistral AI model card (Devstral Small 1.1) · July 2025
- Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B 51.6
Qwen (official repo, OpenHands scaffold, 100 turns) · August 2025
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 51.56
NVIDIA (BF16) · August 2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1
higher is better- Kimi K3 80.9%
Vals leaderboard · August 2026
-
Artificial Analysis (independent) · August 2026
Reasoning
AIME 2024
higher is better- gpt-oss-120b 95.8
OpenAI gpt-oss model card (high reasoning, no tools) · August 2025
- gpt-oss-20b 92.1
OpenAI gpt-oss model card (high reasoning, no tools) · August 2025
- Qwen3 32B 81.4
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
- Qwen3 30B-A3B 80.4
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
- DeepSeek-R1 79.8%
DeepSeek model card · January 2025
- QwQ 32B 79.5
Qwen3 technical report (Table 13, QwQ-32B baseline) · May 2025
- Qwen3 14B 79.3
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
- Qwen3 8B 76.0
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
-
DeepSeek model card · January 2025
GPQA Diamond
higher is better- Qwen3.8-27B 89.2
Qwen (model card) · August 2026
- Muse Glimmer 30B 83.5%
Meta model card · August 2026
- Qwen3.5-9B 81.7
Qwen (model card) · March 2026
- gpt-oss-120b 80.1
OpenAI gpt-oss model card (high reasoning, no tools) · August 2025
- Qwen3.5-4B 76.2
Qwen (model card) · March 2026
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 75.44
NVIDIA (BF16) · August 2026
- DeepSeek-R1 71.5
DeepSeek-R1 technical report · January 2025
- gpt-oss-20b 71.5
OpenAI gpt-oss model card (high reasoning, no tools) · August 2025
- Qwen3 32B 68.4
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
- Qwen3 30B-A3B 65.8
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
- QwQ 32B 65.6
Qwen3 technical report (Table 13, QwQ-32B baseline) · May 2025
- Qwen3 14B 64.0
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
-
DeepSeek-R1 technical report (Table 5) · January 2025
- Qwen3 8B 62.0
Qwen3 technical report (thinking mode) · May 2025
- Gemma 3 27B 42.4
Gemma 3 technical report (27B IT) · March 2025
MATH-500
higher is better- DeepSeek-R1 97.3%
DeepSeek model card · January 2025
-
DeepSeek-R1 technical report (Table 5) · January 2025
MMLU-Pro
higher is better- DeepSeek-R1 84.0
DeepSeek-R1 technical report · January 2025
- Qwen3.5-9B 82.5
Qwen (model card) · March 2026
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 81.94
NVIDIA (BF16) · August 2026
- Qwen3.5-4B 79.1
Qwen (model card) · March 2026
- QwQ 32B 69.07
Qwen model card · March 2025
- Gemma 3 27B 67.5
Gemma 3 technical report (27B IT) · March 2025
Rankings are curated and human-approved. Our pipeline can gather current benchmark figures for review, but nothing is published here without a source and a date.